On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:24:17PM -0700, coderman wrote: > On 10/2/14, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > > DISCLAIMER: I am noob at electronics, this is crazy or > > at best a fishing expedition... > > ... > > If you are lucky to hit stable state, you have solved > > $f(x)=x$. > > what you are describing in a round about way is an adiabatic > representation of brute force. the jury is out, and certainly not with > existing fabrication, but potentially 2^64 cost for a 128 bit key. > this is why TOP SECRET demands 256 bit keys. (also Grover's algorithm, > among other reasons?) > > "the literature" should be enlightening, given these terms to key on. > > > best regards,
Thanks. By "existing fabrication" do you mean we can't manufacture good enough circuit for this purpose (modulo time 2^64)? What is considered wire on the circuit in practice is resistor and the wires will have different resistances which might influence the unorthodoxal experiment?
