Ah, I must correct myself.

On 10/4/14, 1:25 AM, Gregory Foster wrote:
> The James Bamford article sent along by coderman is excellent.
> 
> The Intercept (Oct 2) - "The NSA and Me" by James Bamford [ @WashAuthor ]:
> https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/10/02/the-nsa-and-me/
> 
> I just noticed the article links to an interesting document.
> 
> Rockefeller Commission Report (RCR, 1977)
> "REPORT ON INQUIRY INTO CIA-RELATED ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES"
> http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1304974-report-on-inquiry-into-cia-related-electronic.html#document/p1
> 
>> A 1977 Justice Department report, obtained by reporter James
>> Bamford in 1981 under the Freedom of Information Act, investigating
>> criminal surveillance operations conducted by the CIA and NSA.
> 
> In 1975, the executive branch under President Gerald Ford initiated
> its own investigation of the CIA's and the NSA's activities in
> parallel with the larger committees in the legislature.  The report
> Bamford shared is a (redacted) product of the President's Commission.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_President%27s_Commission_on_CIA_Activities_within_the_United_States


A quick glance at the real RCR shows it is a very different document:
http://history-matters.com/archive/contents/church/contents_church_reports_rockcomm.htm

Instead, here's Bamford from the article:

> The secret investigation grew out of the final report by the Rockefeller 
> Commission, a panel that had been set up by President Gerald Ford to parallel 
> the Church Committee. Issued on June 6, 1975, the report noted that both the 
> NSA and CIA had engaged in questionable and possibly illegal electronic 
> surveillance. As a result, Attorney General Edward Levi established a secret 
> internal task force to look into the potential for criminal prosecution. 
> Focusing particularly on NSA, the task force probed more deeply into domestic 
> eavesdropping than any part of the executive branch had ever done before.
> 
> I had heard rumors from several sources about such a probe, so I thought it 
> would be worth requesting a copy of the file under FOIA. Nevertheless, I was 
> surprised when the documents, with relatively few redactions, turned up at my 
> door 10 months later. They included a lengthy, detailed “Report on Inquiry 
> into CIA-Related Surveillance Activities” that laid out the investigation in 
> stark detail, as well as a shorter draft “prosecutive summary” evaluating the 
> potential for criminal prosecution. I was shocked that the Justice Department 
> had released them to me without notifying the NSA. An official at Justice 
> later told me that it was standard procedure not to notify the object of a 
> criminal investigation (think John Gotti) once it is completed and requested 
> under FOIA.

gf

-- 
Gregory Foster || [email protected]
@gregoryfoster <> http://entersection.com/

Reply via email to