On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:43 PM, MrBiTs <[email protected]> wrote: > You got two great points. First of all I think they didn't catch the main > point of TOR network. Otherwise, who's certifying SSL key?
the security you get from an .onion address isn't all that great, you know. new hidden service names will be a lot longer. also having some certification that it is actually run by them is useful (but ... but ... ca trust! i don't give a fuck right now) > Why in hell somebody in TOR network will access facecrap? If TOR intent to > give anonymous networking, why to use a service where > you get anything but be anonymous? Do this make sense? there are enough reasons for people to use this - while people apparently have their accounts locked when they try to log in through this, i assume that is a kink they will deal with better in the future. in a hostile network, i'd trust a tls secured hidden service more than anything else i have at my disposal also, facebook may be crap but it is just another platform to be used to communicate with people - you may not want what you post associated with your network location or your person - a lot of people also use twitter "anonymously" in the same way, why discriminate platforms it is all the same shit (i said to a fellow gmail user) not everything is about hiding - if you wanted that, say goodbye to modern society
