Dnia piątek, 14 listopada 2014 12:26:34 Ted Smith pisze: > It's "censorship-free" in the sense that a nation-state can't > effectively block their citizens from using Lantern. > > So, it's a censorship-free centralized distribution system, as opposed > to a censorship-proof decentralized publishing system like Freenet.
Call it "for-the-time-being-supposedly-censorship-free", and I might agree. > And it's centralized, so as soon as the central authority (the > satellites) are compromised, the whole system is owned. Exactly. > IMO this is a neat first step -- it's not the whole way, but it's > getting there. Now we just need Freenet or similar on decentralized > microsats. This would be interesting, along with some mesh networks, the FFDN (and similar initiatives), and some free spectrum maybe. -- Pozdr rysiek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
