On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:59:50 -0800 coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If that were the case, then a shielded, passive receiver ought to
> > be OK,
>
> a shielded, passive receiver would be overwhelmed by the brute flood.
>
>
Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a
useless receiver?
If you shield a receiver from a jamming signal, you are also
shielding it from the signal you want to receive? What am I
missing?
