On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:21 +0100
Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So:
> * Distribution is terrible, which causes unstoppable success
distribution is bad because bitcoin isn't really
free-market. It's a patch for a corrupt system - at best.
> * Is less humane and more capable, causing assorted dangers but also
> being more pure (in a currency sense)
Humane? What the hell are you talking about? The fact that
bitcoin can't be counterfeited, at least in theory, is one of
its main advantages.
But I imagine that 'humanism' for you means : the totalitarian
government I favor should be able to print money out of thin air
in order to fund whatever 'free' and compulsory social plan I
like. Obey or die.
> * Can be substituted very easily by something else
>
> I don't really mind Bitcoin becoming successful even though it's
> imperfect; it's still an entirely higher/better league than banks.
But apparently can't be manipulated by governments! The horror.
> do mind there being no talk of why Bitcoin sucks. Because no matter
> how awesome it is, it really does suck.
Of course bitcoin pushers won't talk about why it sucks.
Wait. If I recally correctly, you as a pusher used to whine
about bitcoin being used in black markets because of the bad
press? And now you changed your tune? lol
