Dnia wtorek, 6 stycznia 2015 19:46:20 Patrick Mylund Nielsen pisze: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, 42 <[email protected]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > The CEO of TrustLeap contacted me recently to boast about his > > "unbreakable" security, and that 'we' are doing everything wrong and > > "all open source software is backdoored". > > > > Quotes from the website: > > > TrustLeap can mathematically prove that it has "unbreakable > > > encryption" against unlimited computing power, forever, and by-design. > > > > > > As a result, "modern" cryptography (all the algorithms used today, > > > either standard or custom) is _provably unsafe_. > > > > http://twd-industries.com/faq.html#tab3 > > > > What do you think about that? > > > > There is a challenge: http://twd-industries.com/challenge.html > > > > > This is a page for real experts in cryptography > > > > ...so I thought I'll share it with you guys. > > All that text and I still have no idea what this thing does. The exercise > is pointless: I could give you some plaintext and blob of random garbage > (or just use a one-time pad) and make all the same claims. And the > customers listed on their Customers page are using their Remote Desktop > product, not this. > > But all you really need to know is they're only offering $1,000 as a reward > to people who break their > provably-secure-everybody-else-is-an-idiot-yadda-yadda system. Maybe they > should convince themselves that it's secure first.
stf, can you please post your snakeoil tell-tale signs? I think they might be useful here. ;-) -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
