> A couple of those coins have ongoing block rewards that never
> drop to zero, or proof-of stake, so there's not really a hard
> limit. And then there are non-obvious bugs that can blow up..
To a libertarian, inflation is a "bug", but not necessarily to others.
Models that allow infinite inflation over a long time-period are
different economic models, rather than badly implemented crypto-code.
Personally, I think inherently deflationary is a bad economic model, so
I'd be more inclined towards an inflationary currency.
On 15/01/15 04:24, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:46:40PM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> Plausibility on a scale of 1-5 .. I say 4, what say you all?
When trying to execute a pump&dump scheme, it is more effective
to attack something thinly traded, assuming, of course, that there
are enough marks available to fleece. In other words, pick a
different coin:
http://alt19.com/19/cryptocurrency.php
--dan
Interesting, what do they mean by 'capitalization hard limit'
A couple of those coins have ongoing block rewards that never
drop to zero, or proof-of stake, so there's not really a hard
limit. And then there are non-obvious bugs that can blow up..
And it's rather important to read the code and not the coins
marketing. Some of this stuff is kinda hilarious
https://github.com/fourtytwo42/42/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L835
--
Twitter: @onetruecathal
Phone: +353876363185
miniLock: JjmYYngs7akLZUjkvFkuYdsZ3PyPHSZRBKNm6qTYKZfAM
peerio.com: Use email or phone. Uses above miniLock key.
