On 1/30/15, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Or cheap labor from $thirdworld? Crowdsourcing?
this is a longer story, but yes, i'm using a handful of all of the above. some are better than others. (and some proprietary tools, as well) > For that matter, > funding from special interests for a dedicated natural language > team would probably not be too hard to find if their ROI for input > to later analysis was good. i'm no good at funding, but cursory efforts were not productive. part of my problem is focus on SIGINT/NatSec, when general purpose tools would suffice. no one wants to touch the hot potato unless they're already knee deep in the mash. > I see no problem with running cool projects even exclusively > within darknets. Announcements/links will find their way out to > clearnet. Those who wish to join or read will do so and be > exposed to learning and running some new privacy/crypto tech > needed to get to it as a byproduct. It's a win. More people > should do it for their related projects. And so long as the > darknets can be made to scale, in general. scaling distribution of tens of gigs of reference materials is a challenge. technically it is working, but usability needs some help... (next dist should be easier to mirror) thanks grarpamp! best regards,
