On March 1, 2015 10:51:09 AM brian carroll <[email protected]> wrote:
perhaps the institutionalization of 'royal perks' explains in part the necessity of a one-party governing system, where any actual opposition (politics) are then managed and absorbed into this model, to protect/secure/maintain aristocratic lifestyles otherwise threatened by actual change, where the focus of issues of subsidy then becomes the poor: "hark! peasants are drinking wine, wine!! with Our Money!" (in a top-down surveillance context, who benefits/profits most?)
^ This +100. Very prescient; I could not have put it any better.
