On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:34:17AM -0800, Mike Ingle wrote: > On 3/3/2015 2:16 AM, stef wrote: > >two things: > > > >1/ stop beating the dead horse (email) > That's a silly thing to say on a mailing list, lol. Obviously the medium is > still useful.
i think you mistake the mailing list usecase with the encrypted communication usecase. the two are quite different. > >3/ protocols like pond which address adversarial progress over the years > >should be preferred over outdated and broken protocols. but i guess i'm > >repeating 1/ already. > > > Which adversarial progress are you referring to? GPG has proven itself > robust over the years, and Confidant Mail does not use SMTP. has it? or has parallel construction also evolved? > If you mean forward secrecy, I'm working on that. In the meantime I'd still > rather trust GPG than some unknown protocol. If my private key gets stolen > that's my own fault for being careless. i think this has been now repeated many times enough. smari, matt green, lately even moxy got the memo.. -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt
