On 04/07/2015 06:44 PM, Cari Machet wrote: > mirimir i would have to dig up the quote where the fuck says that basically > it is good us is invading to get back at the iraqi's for 9-11
Please do. I don't believe that he could ever have said that. It's inconceivable. I can imagine that he might have opined that the Hussein regime had to go. But I don't believe that he was ever dumb enough to go for the 9-11 bullshit. > umn the iraqi's had nothing to do with 9-11 and he swallowed that tripe... > i am sorry but that is just stupid x 5 million They obviously didn't. But you need a cite for your claim about him. > i dont care about his excuses my pet spider even knew it was crap I blame it on the Saudi Caliphate backers. They fucking nailed it :( > if you can give him a pass for being 'apathetic' which i wouldnt frame it > like that then that says a lot about you - its not apathy to support a > fucking invasion of a people - people that are apathetic are like i dont > know not oh yay lets do it it is a totally different mindset I'm a very practical guy :) > and that he is here in daily kos framing out this lie says more to me about > his lack of character than anything and you of course didnt address that > part - if the fuck was an actual person he could be like yay i sucked but > now i know better i changed its so great we get to change our minds in our > lifetimes and fucking grow but does gleenny do that no he cant face himself > its pathetic he lives in his ego You have a point ;) > ego doesnt want people saying they are wrong ever and its a death echo > chamber I agree. > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 04/07/2015 11:50 AM, Cari Machet wrote: >>> dear mirimir you cannot read >>> >>> 'Nonetheless, because of the general faith I had in political and media >>> institutions, I assumed - since both political parties and media outlets >>> and journalists from across the ideological spectrum were united in >> support >>> of the war - that there must be some valid basis to the claim that Saddam >>> posed a threat. My basic trust in these institutions neutralized the >>> objections I had and led me to passively acquiesce to what was being done >>> ("I believed then that the president was entitled to have his national >>> security judgment deferred to, and to the extent that I was able to >> develop >>> a definitive view, I accepted his judgment that American security really >>> would be enhanced by the invasion of this sovereign country.").' >>> >>> did you read the motherfucking article? >> >> Yes, I read the motherfucking article. He says that he was apathetic, >> and trusted institutions (and even that asshole W). Maybe he needs to do >> more mea culpas for that, or cut off his left pinkie. But unless you >> cite some public statement where he actively supported the invasion, >> rather than just deferred to arguably better-informed opinions, it's no >> big deal in the current context. In my opinion. >> >>> this should tell you how duplicitous he is just like the government says >> he >>> didnt do anything - he didnt fuck that bitch - oh he fucked them hard >> though >> >> I'd say rather that he let Uncle Dick finger fuck him, but just a little ;) >> >>> also daily kos sucks >> >> Yeah, I don't read that shit. >> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/06/2015 10:29 PM, Juan wrote: >>>>> Well, everything should have been put in the public domain >>>>> from day zero. But Snowden thought that would hurt >>>>> the interests of the american nazi state. Or maybe he didn't >>>>> want to be killed like a dog. Who knows. >>>> >>>> I know. As many people who've attempted to change the Crypto-Fascist >>>> shithole called "America" have noted, the powers that be ARE TOO STRONG >>>> to take on... head on. >>>> >>>> Snowden has set in motion The 'death of a thousand (intelligence) cuts' >>>> to weaken the surveillance state enough that the issue can be approached >>>> at all in some way that MAY change it. >>>> >>>> As far as whether Greenwald and co or Snowden's a capitalist, or a >>>> libertard, a demoncrat or rethuglican (the ONLY diff is who receives the >>>> booty from our imperial adventurism where brown people die) ...is >>>> absolutely irrelevant to the end result. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > >
