> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Travis Biehn <[email protected]> wrote: >> You're just assuming that the generic parental threat isn't omnipotent?
On 6/3/15, Gadit Bielman <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I am. I'm assuming that, if someone were to see some sort of generic Please stop top posting. > parent solution, and they knew that their parents worked at the NSA and > were able to use specialized technical skills, then they would know that it > was just not applicable to their situation. But I'm assuming that that > would nevertheless be useful for 90% of people. Or am I completely wrong > about that? Your assumption of useful to 90% of people is supposed to be relevant to this one person you are supposedly trying to help? > I don't know exactly what I want/expected. Like, it would be absolutely > brilliant if there was some general, > accessible-to-an-arbitrary-more-tech-savvy-than-average-teenager, howto > security, possibly for simplicity specialized to parent-situations, but > accessible security is in general a huge unsolved and possibly unsolvable > problem. I suppose I was hoping to at least start. You've been given quite a few practical starts in this list. Quite a few. Attempts to extract something which does not exist, is not seen in a good light. I suggest chill, and focus on how you might actually help the person you are proclaining to want to help.
