By Richard CowanWASHINGTON (Reuters) - As Washington weighs new cybersecurity 
steps amid a public backlash over mass surveillance, U.S. tech companies warned 
President Barack Obama not to weaken increasingly sophisticated encryption 
systems designed to protect consumers' privacy.In a strongly worded letter to 
Obama on Monday, two industry associations for major software and hardware 
companies said, "We are opposed to any policy actions or measures that would 
undermine encryption as an available and effective tool."The Information 
Technology Industry Council and the Software and Information Industry 
Association, representing tech giants, including Apple Inc, Google Inc, 
Facebook Inc, IBM and Microsoft Corp, fired the latest salvo in what is shaping 
up to be a long fight over government access into smart phones and other 
digital devices.Obama administration officials, led by the FBI, have pushed the 
companies to find ways to let law enforcement bypass encryption to investigate 
illegal activities, including terrorism threats, but not weaken it so that 
criminals and computer hackers could penetrate the defenses.So far, however, 
the White House has not spelled out specific regulatory or legislative steps it 
might seek.View gallery
Some cybersecurity experts are skeptical that Congress will take legislative 
action to expand the administration's powers anytime soon, noting recent 
lopsided votes in the House of Representatives to rein in surveillance.White 
House spokesman Josh Earnest, responding to Reuters' inquiries, said the 
administration "firmly supports the development and robust adoption of strong 
encryption."But he added there were concerns about "the use of encryption by 
terrorists and other criminals to conceal and enable crimes and other malicious 
activity."FBI'S INTENTIONS KEYKate Martin, director of the Center for National 
Security Studies, a civil liberties watchdog group, said, "The ultimate 
question is whether the FBI is going to seek legislation that would put limits 
on development of encryption tools."View gallery
The Obama administration is in the midst of an internal debate on the matter. 
Martin said the recent naming of Ed Felten, a computer science and public 
affairs expert, as deputy U.S. chief technology officer was an indication that 
Obama "takes seriously the privacy concerns."But at the same time, she noted, 
"Technology, and especially the globalization of communications, has outpaced 
U.S. law."The debate over whether there should be limits on encryption should 
include the question of whether there should be limits on when the government 
can lawfully get access to people's private information, Martin said.The 
industry letter to Obama also was sent to FBI Director James Comey, Homeland 
Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and other 
Cabinet heads.Days earlier, the United States enacted legislation that will 
curtail the government's ability to scoop up huge volumes of data related to 
records of Americans' telephone calls.View gallery
At the same time, Washington is being battered by computer hacks. Last week a 
massive breach was disclosed at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, with 
records of up to 4 million current and former federal employees possibly 
compromised.An explosion in government surveillance was an outgrowth of the 
Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and was exposed by former National 
Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.The industry groups noted that online 
commerce has flourished in part because consumers believed their payment 
information would be secure."Consumer trust in digital products and services is 
an essential component enabling continued economic growth of the online 
marketplace," the industry wrote."Accordingly, we urge you not to pursue any 
policy or proposal that would require or encourage companies to weaken these 
technologies, including the weakening of encryption or creating encryption 
'work-arounds'."(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Kevin 
Drawbaugh and Tom Brown)

Reply via email to