On 07/10/2015 12:17 AM, Seth wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:20 -0700, Tom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wouldn't it have been enough to post the url? >> >> http://ptrace.fefe.de/fpalm30c3.jpg > > I actually appreciate content posted in message, get tired of having > to fire up a browser for links. Also every click on a browser link is > a potential attack whereas plain-text in an email is not. >
Riseup flagged it as potential ***Spam***, despite normally having no problem with coderman's postings b/c 'links'. Just b/c 'plaintext' means you don't have to risk a click doesn't mean what's in the text (and all that may come from receiving it) is 'un-monitored'. RR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkXHsK4AQPs Ps. Old enough to remember when Ozzie had pimples
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
