On July 16, 2015 11:49:47 AM grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Shelley <[email protected]> wrote: > On July 16, 2015 10:24:23 AM "Stephen D. Williams" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 7/16/15 7:51 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Stephen D. Williams wrote: >> >> In a lot of ways, this is an elegant solution and could arguably be >> >> much more secure than desktop apps in Windows. Assuming your >> > Lol, is this positive or negative argument? >> > >> > it can hardly be less secure than windoze imho. >> > >> Cypherpunks + Windows, what do you think? > > It's making me break out in hives, stop it! :p > > *shudder* The bazillion lines of effectively unaudited code in opensource kernels and software should have the same effect upon you.
It does; nothing is ever 100% safe, we must not become complacent. But FOSS : acne, Windoze (and Flash, Java, .js, etc) : ebola!
-S
