On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:59:11AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote: > One saving grace about RFC 2631 was that it was pretty much universally > ignored for the reason that it was, well, a pretty stupid way to do things, so > the number of affected implementations would be approximately zero. >
Even if "affected implementations would be approximately zero", can we count this as "crypto backdoored RFC" as per OP?
