On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> For those who can help, please do a Google search for 'Bell further
> alleged in his 2003'You will notice that there are MANY results that
> contain that phrase, but have something close to gibberish, before
> and after it.
Weird. The search results I'm seeing (first page)
1) book titled "crypto anarchy"
2)
http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/ridgefield-connecticut-public-records.html
3)
http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/jail-records-vine.html
4)
http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/do-you-have-to-get-a-background-check-to-buy-.html
5) Jim's wikipedia article
6)
http://buriedwithoutceremony.com/wp-includes/service/indiana-state-police-records-division.html
7)
http://buriedwithoutceremony.com/wp-includes/service/arizona-public-records-wills.html
8)
http://www.vinnatur.org/wp-includes/service/free-website-to-view-criminal-records.html
9)
http://www.vinnatur.org/wp-includes/service/free-criminal-records-bureau-uk.html
10)
http://culturesource.net/data/records/criminal-background-guidelines.html
results 2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10 all go to the same spam page.
In other words, google is such an incredible piece of shit that
they can't even run a search engine?
> Some results are genuine, but most are apparently not.
> I suspect that I am the victim of some sort of SEO-techniques,
...that work against an IT company that rules the universe and
has a 'market cap' of 428 000 million dollars...
> attempting to cover up the fact of the fake, forged appeal case
> 99-30210. I suspect that the following company had something to do
> with it: http://www.icmconsulting.com/seo.html See, for
> instance, http://www.simcoehall.com/service/background-check-expunged.html
> Jim Bell
