On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:33:45 +0200 rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia niedziela, 4 października 2015 16:08:55 Juan pisze: > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:51:58 +0300 > > > > Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> 1. How do you distribute goods (food, shelter, shiny J-Pads, > > > >> money? etc) > > > >> > > > > free market > > > > > > What is a sound definition of free market? > > > > Georgi, if you are really interested in the topic, do your > > own homework. > > > > http://jim.com/Molinari.htm > > But you do realise that there are different views on what a "truly > free market" is, right? Wrong. Did you even bother to skim the text I linked to? > Is it the one where is the least regulation? There's no 'regulation' in a free market. Your question shows that you don't what a free market is. > Is that the one where the better offer always wins? Better offer of what? A free market isn't defined by outcomes. > These are not > necessarily the same, as cartels and monopolies strive in a "free > market without regulation". LMAO! Sure. Competition leads to monopoly and 'free' actually means regulated. > > So, which is it for you? Tell me, and *then* I can do my research. It's quite clear that you don't have a clue rysiek. FIRST you do your research about liberalism and THEN you try to come up with something that at least looks like criticism. > > Being vague is a very good way to not go into a true discussion. If > that's what you're after, good going. :) I wasn't vague at all. Check the literature I linked. But you're right about something. I don't want to waste time with people who only have knee-jerk reactions and dismiss something they don't even know what it is. > > > (...) > > > In particular: > > > > > > 1. How does the ``free market'' prevents _cartels_ and stays free? > > > 2. In a stateless free market, what happens to orphans, > > > physically/mentally impaired people and the like? > > > > They are sold as cat and dog food for the pets of the rich > > people. > > Well, at least we're clear. We've been clear all the time. I know that you don't have a clue and only parrot establishment propaganda. > > > > IMHO realworld implementation of ``free market'' is the law of the > > > jungle played with (virtual) money/goods on a Ponzi scheme > > > playground (check the thread about the usa debt). > > > > That is, you don't know what "free market" means and yet you > > are wasting time discussing it and apparently trying to > > refute something you don't have a clue about it. > > So which version of the "free market" you propose? There are many. > Drop the bluffing rysiek. I know that you don't know what you're talking about.
