Lovely, I'm interested in the insanity that would ensue from trying to get 'these populations' to agree on priorities for development efforts.
-Travis On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:21 AM, oshwm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 07/10/15 14:25, Travis Biehn wrote: > > Normalizing / randomizing is fine. Anonymity sticks out, hasn't learned > to > > blend in. > > > > Keyboard timing is way down the list gentlemans. If you want to avoid it, > > get drunk every time you use a webapp. > > Fair point, has anyone ever produced a peer agreed priority ordered list > of privacy and anonymity threatening devices or software etc classified > with either solved/not solved? > > It's a simple stupid question and I probably know the answer but is it > something needed so that globally all activists/coders/etc can work > through it? > > > -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
