Cryptome just deleted all the quoted tweets for some reason. Weird, right? Well, here are the archived versions.
http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203031/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953 http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https:/twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328 http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096 http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203916/https:/twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840 http://web.archive.org/web/20151009210749/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120 Looks like I forgot to archive https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816. Oh well. You get the idea. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is Cryptome's full set (so far) of post-admission replies. I'm unable > to make anything consistent out of it. > > "Admission of leaked logs" is rather generously overstated of what we > specifically understated. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953 > Me: You understated things? As in, left something(s) out?? > Cryptome: Told what was needed to defuse your exaggeration and resist > your demands to auth visitors. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328 > > Note that Cryptome doesn't dispute the email that I quoted, which was copy > and pasted in it's entirety. > > > Rigged and disinfo remain valid. You overstated the disclosure. Leaking is > press exaggeration. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096 > > Nothing is ever deleted, that is subterfuge to escape culpability. You > ratted Cryptome visitors. Not the first or last. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816 > *Note that Cryptome is definitely NOT using subterfuge to escape > culpability or advising users of the data leak/breach/compromise/whatever > spin word Cryptome wants to use. > > Still refusing to validate what you faked, rigged and released. And will > not, it's your story, run with it. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840 > > Our claims remain valid despite the biased cherry-picking so beloved of > childish argumentum ad hominem -- Cicero's bitch. > https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120 > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/9/15, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ... >> > Not sure how I was right AND the info is rigged and disinfo... >> >> QUANTUMSQUIRREL casts suspicion, just like shade, too. >> > >
