Again, look at the first email where I asked for help verifying it, Cari. Sorry if it wasn't direct enough for your tastes.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Cari Machet <[email protected]> wrote: > No i am talking about this list - this list is a community > > You did not ask this list for help that i can see ... prove me wrong > > You are saying jy did not admit ... you complain about it yet accept no > critique of said by you > > Have a think about it go for a walk rest take a few days and get back to > me after > On Oct 11, 2015 7:38 PM, "Michael Best" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *Cari Machet* [email protected] >>> >>> <carimachet%40gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CCAGRDzQWNCCe7AUOL%3D-YoFUdi5%2Bm2KPxsq30D3OJzgJjQUrMaCw%40mail.gmail.com%3E>*Sun >>> Oct 11 12:25:43 EDT 2015* >>> reveal was to protect the community (fr john) then why was that act > >>> protecting the community > avoided by mike >> >> Plus no ask to the list but said asked the list and if the point of the >>> >> >> First email asked for help, no reason the list was excluded from that >> even though I explicitly asked John for help verifying it. Then I asked >> open endedly on Twitter. >> >> Also, you seem to be confusing this list with the community of Cryptome's >> visitors. There's overlap, sure, but they are *not* the same. >> >> Plus, John deleted the early emails I made to the Cryptome list, which is >> more explicitly the mailing list that would be best identified as the >> community you're referring to. >> >
