On 10/12/2015 08:36 AM, Razer wrote: > "Let me make this PERFECTLY CLEAR" > > It's not a 'mirror'. So far as I can see, it's a dump. The National > Security Archive maintains a mirror @IA and you aren't going to find any > dox 'in the wild' or modified, or even SUSPECTED of being modified dox > on that reflector.
IA is a very cool thing. But they play it very safe. So I totally don't get the idea of expecting them to host even Ctyptome-level stuff. In my experience, controversial stuff lasts maybe a few hours there. > On 10/11/2015 03:45 PM, coderman wrote: > >> for this, i am quite grateful to see the archive.org natsec section >> expanded with cryptome mirror! >> > > > > On 10/11/2015 03:45 PM, coderman wrote: > > On 10/10/15, Shelley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ... >> The Cryptome archives *are* publicly accessible. John limits bots and >> leechers to a certain number of files per day (as is his right, he is >> paying for the bandwidth), approx 100 iirc, but anyone who can use search >> strings can find anything on the site. > > it is exceptionally difficult, short of ordering physical duplicates, > to obtain a significant portion of cryptome archive from cryptome.org. > > part of this is inherent abuse - any mirror gets serious algorithmic > beatings - akin to HackingTeam mirrors perhaps, not counting the > mindless cloud VM bot walkers, annoying enough. even the hidden > service only mirrors got offensive proddings. remember, some of > cryptome-opponents are relying on obscurity - thwarted every time some > makes a mirror... > > for this, i am quite grateful to see the archive.org natsec section > expanded with cryptome mirror! > https://archive.org/details/nationalsecurityarchive > > thanks to all involved (esp. you, Michael > > > best regards, > > >
