On 10/15/2015 11:23 PM, Shelley wrote: > This isn't just about being identified in the logs, but their very > existence.
I'll repeat myself, with emphasis: > On 10/15/2015 02:05 AM, oshwm wrote: >> Yeh, apparently Pierre Omidyar has offered John a position as journalist >> and so John no longer needs to run Cryptome :D > John's doing a 'BB', and he hasn't even done time... Because there's > nothing to do time over, and TRULY, nothing worthwhile to see in > Cryptome's logs. *The only potential 'stink' here is if John had said he > wasn't keeping > logs, and he did so HIMSELF. If Network Solutions did so and kept the > logs as required by the feds (and by the feds for perpetuity if > there's encrypted data), there's fuckingwellnothing John could do > about it, and IF he could acquire them from NetSol to sell signed and > numbered editions, it NOT on him, but on all the idiots who visited > his site 'barefoot'.* > > > RR
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
