See that's the thing, John. Cypherpunks would not operate such a site with any court having "effective" jurisdiction.
-------- Original Message -------- From: grarpamp <[email protected]> Apparently from: [email protected] To: John Young <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Nominee officers and directors (was: Why cryptome sold weblogs...) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:20:18 -0400 > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:06 PM, John Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > Documents are removed from this site only by order > > served directly by a US court having jurisdiction. > > Belief is that some docs (particularly those in the junk / history category) > have been removed without such order, instead of left for audience review. > References elude, diff the great archives to find.
