On 10/25/2015 05:08 PM, Cari Machet wrote: <SNIP>
> I am totally clear that i can not engage empathy if i have such judgements > about armed struggle to call it counter revolutionary ... should the > spanish had committed mass suicide ... should the palestinians ? Math is a > factor we only have so many functionalities to work with and until these > functionalities are expanded more thru serious fucking profound massive > work it cannot be different > > People are working to expand functionalities now and doing amazing work but > there are many ways to dismantle the state i cannot shove one way into > oblivion in my mind because i dont know everything so... each frame is > different and to me respecting anothers frame is fucking anarchism and > without the respect of the other aspect anarchy would be too weak or what > would it even be? I make my own decisions about fighting. I read "settle the disputes of their rulers and de facto owners" to mean fighting for them, out of loyalty, fear or whatever. That's distinct from fighting against them. More generally, I believe in nonaggression, and self defense. > Not sure why you have to write specifically about me steve > On Oct 26, 2015 3:34 AM, "Mirimir" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/25/2015 12:00 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Steve Kinney <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> War is public murder for private profit. >>>> ... >>>> Everyone who takes up arms to >>>> settle the disputes of their rulers and de facto owners is a >>>> traitor to the human race as a whole. >>>> ... >>>> The "fog of war" has another name, propaganda >>> >>> This. >> >> Yes, that! >> >>> (Oh fuck, there I go fucking up my oneliner score again, might as >>> well throw in a few fucks for good measure, as if I give a fuck, at >>> least this next fuck from some other fucker might count as one >>> more fuck to the good, lol...) >>> >>>> study the fuck out of war and encourage others to do likewise. >>> >> >
