From: coderman <[email protected]> To: jim bell <[email protected]> Cc: Cari Machet <[email protected]>; cpunks <[email protected]> On 10/31/15, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >> I also solved David Friedman's "Hard problem", see his book, "The >> Machinery of Freedom", the previously-assumed difficulty or impossibility >> of providing for the defense of a fully libertarian or anarchistic society. >i'd support AP with a basic income in place. otherwise, the few >outliers could out leverage even the most widely prevalent crowd >dispositions... >basic income + assassination politics == awesome future!**[ **this conjecture >remains to be proven... ] This sounds like a contradiction in terms. "basic income" implies that somebody is forced to provide somebody else an income. Someone using force is anathemato AP: Anyone feeling such force can use AP to act against those doing that forcing. Forcing stops. "Basic income" stops. Jim Bell
