On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:42:32 -0700 coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/1/15, Juan <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > There isn't much proof that 'enough incentives' will get > > the job done. You just restated a baseless assertion. > > just because we've never had AP does not mean that it won't work. Sure. But I never said "It won't work because it's new". I'm just asking for more details. > > there are plenty of cases where those with privileged access and > lifetime reputation betray it for roughly millions or less, in USD. It seems (kinda obvious) to me that to get rid of 'high ranking' targets you need a 'professional' service, agree? You are saying that those targets will be taken down by 'traitors'? That can happen sometimes but I don't think it would be common. Also notice that 'traitors' a la snowden don't do it for money. And he didn't kill anybody either (and he's no anarchist anyway) Yet you are saying that a 'modern', big, very well funded government can be overthrown by buying off some of its members with a few million dollars? > > the rest, assuming AP exists, becomes probabilities and patience.
