On 11/3/15, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Comments in law are always well received as too many people > are unaware of law in general. > > http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/supreme-court-landmarks > >> and are available to potential predictors. Anonymous? Ideally, so that > > Interesting in that the level of anonymity desired by makers and > takers may shift as any particular campaign progresses. For > example, by those thinking they will win out at the end and be > viewed as heroes and leaders (all too human concepts) after the fray. > Why indeed in history... all successful revolutions have profitable > byproducts for their makers, and for the quashers of failed ones.
perhaps *@cpunks.org first against the wall, after all? there is a book i bought as a teen that is no longer possible to print and sell. that doesn't feel like progress...
