On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:55 AM, rysiek <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > So, do I understand correctly, that it would be better had the ECHR ruled > otherwise?
"In a stunning reversal, the ECHR has ruled itself impotent, and moral hazard in perpetuating a belief that retroactive judicial action brings justice to earth humankind. In a gruesome show of contrition, they committed synchronous seppuku across the marble steps of the court house. Back you, Bob."
