I have the beginnings of a plan for this; I'll share more as soon as I double check a few things and run some numbers.
I shall call it... Project OPERATION. On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/17/16, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Not at all weird; it seems pretty effective to me. Over 11 million > >> pages "released" and only 10% _printed_ (as in someone would have to > >> scan the page to get it back into electronic format) sounds like a > >> pretty good access control system for something you don't really want > >> to make public. > > > > > > Unfortunately you're right. The weird part to me is the way it's > justified > > and presented as a transparency tool! Double speak never dies, I suppose. > > =( > > Where is it presented as a transparency tool? They seem to be real > clear about what they're doing: > "In order to directly access CREST, a researcher must visit the > National Archives at > College Park, Maryland. CIA recognizes that such visits may be > inconvienent and > present an obstacle to many researchers." > > Regards, > Lee >
