Jason McVetta wrote: > I presume an actually-secure phone would be highly illegal for a > civilian commoner to possess.
There's no such thing as 'secure' with any form, of electronic communication. There's "More secure". -- RR "Through counter-intelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble-makers ... And neutralize them, neutralize them, neutralize them"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
