Is this self-parodying performance art? -Travis
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Александр <[email protected]> wrote: > Zenaan Harkness: >> OK, new threads by me are definitely getting rejected, and >> instantaneously too... >> Due to a separate rejection, I take it that cross-posting has also >> been banned for my email address. >> >> >> I will not do any run around of creating (or using) an alternate email >> address especially for cp@. >> That's just an arms race and as I've always said: >> - >> * it has been and remains my intention to respect the intentions ofthe >> founders/ creators of this mailing list* >> >> Whaaaat??? > Who told you the "creators" of this mailing list did that to you? Dont you > forget our friends from the NSA. > And second question is... have they got this kind of right to ban someone > from the list? > *It contradicts the whole concept of the cypherpunk idea/ls.* > > If any of you have a suggestion for an alternate mailing list, I would >> certainly consider joining. >> > Me too. > > PS, if anyone wants to post this email publicly, I certainly consent >> to you doing so. >> > i post this reply with your letter to cypherpunk list right now. > > On 2/26/16, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: >> > OK, new threads by me are definitely getting rejected, and >> > instantaneously too... >> > >> > Due to a separate rejection, I take it that cross-posting has also >> > been banned for my email address. >> > >> > I will not do any run around of creating (or using) an alternate email >> > address especially for cp@. >> > That's just an arms race and as I've always said: >> > - it has been and remains my intention to respect the intentions of >> > the founders/ creators of this mailing list >> > >> > So whoever is running/ administrating this list has decided they want >> > to clip my wings. In principle that's fair enough, BUT: >> > >> > - no one ever emailed me offlist or onlist saying that they are an >> > administrator of the list and that they wanted me to post less, or to >> > meet some other conditions >> > - such behaviour is cowardly, like a stab in the back >> > - such behaviour provides no opportunity for me to respect the >> > administrator(s) of the list - since they never owned up to being an >> > administrator, and never admitted to me their requirements about >> > posting less or in some other way, they are being cowardly and >> > providing no opportunity to me, to meet their requirements >> > - I do not accept cowardly behaviour from list administrators >> > - I thought cp@ was not a list of cowards, or for cowards >> > >> > I am not interested in participating in half a mailing list (one where >> > I can only receive emails and reply to other people, but not post new >> > threads and not cross-post). >> > >> > I am not interested in participating in a mailing list where temporary >> > (or permanent) restrictions are put in place without notice to the >> > person being restricted. I will not accept such cowardly behaviour. >> > >> > SO, short of the cypherpunks list administrator(s) apologising to me >> > for their cowardliness, and reinstating my posting privileges for my >> > primary email address, and stating clearly their requirements for >> > posting to the list, and doing this publicly on the list so other >> > people know the requirements for posting to the list, then I shall >> > remove myself from this so-called "community" and find some other >> > place where who I am is respected, and where cowards are told to grow >> > the fuck up! Some place where children are not pretending they're >> > adults with their cowardly behaviour. >> > >> > Alex, Juan, Jim, coderman and Steve, in one way or another you have >> > eached gained my respect. Thank you each for being who you are. If any >> > of you have a suggestion for an alternate mailing list, I would >> > certainly consider joining. I am still not in a stable enough living >> > environment nor with any ADSL internet access, so I am still not in a >> > position to set up an email server myself - but I am confident that >> > this situation will change within about 1 year. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Zen >> > >> > PS, if anyone wants to post this email publicly, I certainly consent >> > to you doing so. >> > >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:22 +0000 >> > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> > >> > [email protected] >> > >> > Technical details of permanent failure: >> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the >> > server for the recipient domain cpunks.org by mail.jfet.org. >> > [209.141.47.85]. >> > >> > The error that the other server returned was: >> > 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>... User unknown >> > >> > >> > ----- Original message ----- >> > >> > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; >> > >> > h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject >> > :from:to:content-type; >> > bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=; >> > >> > b=OryopE3gJFsd/caCZuD8w1+IDk09WC0poE5hGpLdKz0PcleP2Fb4gISlOFiDMoA3yI >> > >> > ATBy5Fycqg7yclQpt20kzkfZlrCxBjW/ZycH5NHzx6y95XCziQqg+axWtPEmv0KKFC45 >> > >> > Js6Y+Ixg60h2h5kw40efPheUILIf4Jo1c3oT1gjR2zAK1NoIWKVbsT/j71vFHRioAcyh >> > >> > mSvEmJwCAeAbgrvB6sOm1RLRavRK+kf8smc1r9XrVYfhmc5AW9ImVgBfuW/NFVu3dC/G >> > >> > FfpvhSbiEqnubkZO4SA7lv2L6NvVzSCUQEp18lcOtvsFQNWJ9Ynb9rKWuiwAyHkukLO0 >> > R9oA== >> > X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> > d=1e100.net; s=20130820; >> > >> > h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date >> > :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; >> > bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=; >> > >> > b=m0iSFBE5X6LXASFuLy3LtbH87fh29RwudGRyAY+fCs5Zf9ycQjszLti6G2v/ZyLYs4 >> > >> > dzz5xfGGdRxQ9nP8BwKUStgkKEx3+sDeAxhGEGaXTV31nkJCkkM/zU6S58Q9BFqnuglv >> > >> > qxMmQ9b0t6y6HYV6KFbzbExNm1eZGyhUATvmQuJin4xSqMccTg5yCmaFMZCWNVQvi97o >> > >> > fkvjLhNdXGlFa7LZF64+bSZo3DaQ3A4Lie5PzMIHwJ45fiYGmEQ9k19FA3coKXLgBbJt >> > >> > iYP1ru7+NgHxOj3kYN4b1c5e7Mk0XL1YMtpXXOu/FGPAnnHrwF9cQdx02cHBxcKK9AEh >> > 1hMQ== >> > X-Gm-Message-State: >> > >> AG10YOQkeCLfQTlTygaAo2pvfPPTrKtT4dHj+741KUByO3hji+2FOcqAJ1QD4HYl9thETnU47zL4LNVBBwIieg== >> > MIME-Version: 1.0 >> > X-Received: by 10.140.93.166 with SMTP id >> > d35mr58532521qge.29.1456439895793; >> > Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800 (PST) >> > Sender: [email protected] >> > Received: by 10.55.64.68 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800 >> (PST) >> > In-Reply-To: >> > <CAOsGNSQG=0z3ut0watwqvk8th3v2b6p3fd9u7+6ml_txhib...@mail.gmail.com> >> > References: >> > <CAOsGNSQG=0z3ut0watwqvk8th3v2b6p3fd9u7+6ml_txhib...@mail.gmail.com> >> > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:15 +0000 >> > X-Google-Sender-Auth: CnxMVt6WvC7DvbEQhsq0PMLZarg >> > Message-ID: >> > <CAOsGNSQRsHDjaBqo_5b1K8jPknD2yN6LR1A6ruHoKs7N44r=r...@mail.gmail.com> >> > Subject: Re: A sane platform for president - what is your fundamentals >> for >> > Eben Moglen? >> > From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> >> > To: [email protected] >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> > > > -- > > -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
