On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:52:24PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > > Don't know about courts, here is a reference from thereg: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/07/lulzsec_takedown_analysis/ > > That's not a quote from an original source. Neither is what it references... > http://blog.erratasec.com/2012/03/notes-on-sabu-arrest.html > ... which goes to Fox, which probably goes to... and to... and to... > ... including possibly to stretching / ignoring the law, parallel > construction... > or to some other legit defendant screwup... at least until the quote > is validated. > > Have the actual chain of custodied investigative materials as to exactly > how the SilkRoad server was found come out yet? (And other similarly fishy > cases where nodes on supposedly strong overlay networks were found...) > Or is that still wrapped in grand jury, work product, state secret, > in camera, sealed...
If you find out, let us know. This is the most "official" version for me for now.
