On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:41:05PM +0100, rysiek wrote: > So let me pose a question here: is it possible to design a protocol that does > not succumb to economy of scale-based secondary centralisation? Is it > possible > to design a protocol that does not lend itself to economy of scale? >
Maybe it is possible to design such, but design is not that important. You _must_ implement it in the real world(tm). Some of your threats include: people technology (backdoors, bugs, sickyouaruty) TLAs governments Won't be surprised if bitcoin is illegal in parts of the real world(tm).
