Sean Lynch wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Georgi Guninski > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:32:05PM -0500, Steve Kinney wrote: > > Aleutians and east to North America. But the Pacific based > > seafood industries can breathe easy: USDA has increases allowable > > levels of hot isotopes, and if you can't prove in Court that a > > particular environmental source caused your cancer, nobody is > > liable. > > > > > I can't find any evidence USDA did this, but I do recall reading that > the Japanese health authorities had. But the old levels, much like FCC > RF exposure limits, weren't based on any science showing harm, just on > the levels they'd typically see. That doesn't mean the new levels > aren't dangerous, but it also doesn't mean the old levels were safe. > It's all about cost of compliance. We just need more research to know > what levels are genuinely safe or dangerous. Though to some extent the > Japanese are providing this by acting as a living experiment. If there > isn't an increase of cancers from eating food at the higher levels, > then hopefully the higher levels are fine.
Can always get your fish from the Gulf of Mexico "Scientists have found a 10 million gallon 'bath mat' of oil on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico" Despite the article's claim it's NOT just from the BP Deepwater/Horizon disaster. NO ONE is keeping tabs on all those thousands of abandoned capped off wells in the Gulf either. http://www.businessinsider.com/bps-deepwater-horizon-spill-has-left-tons-of-oil-on-the-gulfs-floor-2015-2 -- RR "The earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have /names and addresses/." ~U. Utah Phillipsx
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
