According to: https://www.wauland.de/en/news.html
With a letter from the Hamburg tax authorities, the Wau Holland Foundation's charitable status (tax exemption) was reinstated, applying retroactively for 2011. Ryan Carboni: > What is Cryptome? > > "Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by > governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of > expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national > security, intelligence, and secret governance -- open, secret and > classified documents -- but not limited to those." > > A trollish statement saying, "everything in short". > > Cryptome insinuated that Protonmail is less secure after using an > israeli reverse proxy ( > https://web.archive.org/web/20160318180805/https://cryptome.org/2015/11/protonmail-ddos.htm > ). How is it less secure? > > Protonmail's response: > https://protonmail.com/support/knowledge-base/protonmail-israel-radware/ > > It says something if Fox News allowed a favorable AP report on > Cryptome on their website: > http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/03/09/older-less-flashy-than-wikileaks-cryptome-perseveres-as-favored-site-for.html > > https://web.archive.org/web/20160329170005/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/cryptome_on_wikileaks/ > John Young states that Wikileaks is a criminal organization for needing money. > > Compare and contrast Cryptome and Wikileaks: > The Wau Holland Foundation collected $1.2 million for Wikileaks, and > later no longer could recieve donations from Paypal, while it's > charitable status was challenged and revoked by German authorities. > > Cryptome is now a non-profit. > >
