I hate google, but for non Supreme Court cases you can use scholar.google.com and click "case law" and do a search. It seems like the source you got that quote from messed up because the proper citation is Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1, 100 S. Ct. 2502, 65 L. Ed. 2d 555 (1980). Also, that quote isn't found in that ruling. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=683186685758382033
Another option is to go to a county or state law library and use WestLaw Next or Lexis Nexis for free to do a search for the cases you want. WestLaw has a button that lets you email the court rulings to yourself. jim bell: > There is a good site for Supreme Court cases: > https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home > A good case on jurisdiction is > https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/96-643 "Steel Co. v. Citizens > for a Better Environment". (1998)>From the syllabus (which is not part of the > actual decision): > "(b) This Court declines to endorse the “doctrine of hypothetical > jurisdiction,” under which several Courts of Appeals have found it proper to > proceed immediately to the merits question, despite jurisdictional > objections, at least where (1) the merits question is more readily resolved, > and (2) the prevailing party on the merits would be the same as the > prevailing party were jurisdiction denied. That doctrine carries the courts > beyond the bounds of authorized judicial action and thus offends fundamental > separation-of-powers principles. In a long and venerable line of cases, this > Court has held that, without proper jurisdiction, a court cannot proceed at > all, but can only note the jurisdictional defect and dismiss the suit. See, > e.g., Capron v. Van Noorden , 2 Cranch 126; Arizonans for Official English v. > Arizona, 520 U. S. ___, ___. Bell v. Hood ,supra ; National Railroad > Passenger Corp. v. National Assn. of Railroad Passengers, 414 U. S. 453; > Norton v. Mathews, 427 U. ! S. 524;Se c retary of Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (per curiam); United States v. Augenblick, 393 U. S. 348; Philbrook v. Glodgett, 421 U. S. 707; and Chandler v. Judicial Council of Tenth Circuit, 398 U. S. 74, distinguished. For a court to pronounce upon a law’s meaning or constitutionality when it has no jurisdiction to do so is, by very definition, an ultra vires act. Pp. 8–17." > Jim Bell > > > From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:32 PM > Subject: How to download the full ruling of USA Supreme Court cases? > > Can this be done? > > For example, this quote and "case" reference, should have some context: > "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be > decided." [Maine v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 250] > > How do I find the document containing that quote? > > That quote and reference can be found by google on many sites in many > documents, but only as the quote - the full source document/ ruling > would provide the context, which would be more useful. > > Some examples of URLs with the above quote (besides many others): > http://freedom-school.com/lewis-mohr/bowden-petition-and-challenge-to-jurisdiction.pdf > http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/how-beat-any-court-case > http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2007/05/cp-6.html > > > >
