On July 21, 2016 2:26:18 AM EDT, juan <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 01:52:11 -0600 >Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 07/19/2016 03:38 PM, juan wrote: >> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 03:40:20 -0600 >> > Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On 07/19/2016 03:15 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> >>> The dawning inescapable realisation that "he's right" and was >> >>> right all along about Tor Inc. >> >> >> >> Well, I wouldn't go that far ;) >> >> >> >> If Tor were actually secure, I could accept that US government >> >> uses it for evil. >> > >> > So Mirimir, what's the problem here? Am I failing to explain >> > fuckingly basic facts or are you playing dumb? >> > >> > Tor IS actually secure IF YOU ARE THE FUCKING US MILITARY. >> > If on the other hand you are one of their TARGETS then tor IS NOT >> > SECURE. >> > >> > Is something unclear? >> >> What's your evidence for that? I doubt that it's technical, from what >> you've shared. > > It certainly is 'technical', pretty basic, and you must be > as aware of this just as I am, so I don't understand why you > want me to repeat it. Trolling? Bah. > > But here it goes again! Pay fucking attention. > > The US military is a 'global adversary' - they have enough taps > on cables, exchanges, ASs, whatever, to be able to deanonimize > tor users. Especially so called 'hidden' services. > > > On the other hand, people like, say, Ross Ulbricht, don't have > taps on the global fiber infrastructure, don't have access to > IXPs, can't hack routers, etc. Get that?
I agree, sadly. I still think it's interesting tech though. John -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
