Reese wrote: > Aye, noted and understood. I still think extraordinary claims require > extraordinary proofs - i.e., blanket assertions of strong, secure crypto in > Win products require.... as much as I personally hate anything that's got to do with M$, I don't see why they would not be able to write 128bit SSL into exploder or any other kind of strong encryption. given the past quality history of their products, I think it is safe to assume that they've included both a couple of bugs and a couple of additional "features" that are incompatible with anything but their own implementation. for example, the crypto dll's will most likely require that you install IE5.
