>reason. Also, I would never start insulting another person
>in a discussion in order to alleviate my frustration about
I apologize if that was taken as an insult. I just wanted to
concisely express my thought. And I hide behind remailers because
I am a certified violent person (CVP) with tendency to shoot opponents,
usually in the head, and they don't want to continue discussion
after that.
But assertion that "it will likely be held unacceptable" is a political
statement, very precisely coloured. And you are constantly trying to
pass this opinionating for the facts, or worse, for the science. And if
it a pure coincidence that this matches state/corps wet dreams, then I
again apologize for the "suck up" part.
>out that there is a huge difference in the ease with which one
>can use and misuse digital cash as opposed to paper cash. It
This is, again, fiction. There is no digital cash to speak of, so
we can all speculate ad nauseam what it would be like. That is pointless
and unsupportable.
But cash did exist for several hundred years, and it works. And replacing
it with traceable bits introduces capability to tip the scales of personal
freedoms. And I have never seen a state that would miss such opportunity.
As for "If you would know me, and would know what I have had to go
through" - DO IT IN STYLE MAN ! Do not apologize. Bringing in your
past would degrade this to ad hominem level. I don't care who you are
or who you were. What you do now is what counts.
"extortion in digital cash systems" is just the fifth rider of Infocalypse.
Oh, I forgot. It's just the nickname for the "Money Launderer" guy.
ps. on sucking up: we all do it, but we have to be reminded - very few
are capable of saying "I am sucking up".
