I think there may be a claim in defamation if your site was blocked and the software claims you have some kind of nasty content... On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, William Allen Simpson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > I finally took the time to read the whole (very long) web page, and it > is quite interesting -- I wish that all analysis had such detailed > explanations! Any above-average congress-critter should be able to > understand quite a bit of it. ;-) > > The Merc report says: > > In its legal filings, Microsystems said it suffered ``irreparable harm'' > from the publication of the bypassing software, which it said sought > to destroy the market for its product by rendering it ineffective. > > Is there a right for snake oil salesmen to profit from a questionable > product? As the report shows, the hashing and encryption functions > didn't meet any standard well-known design requirements. And many > sites are improperly blocked, while many other sites are missing. > > Instead, isn't there a civil cause of action by all the purchasers of > the product? It manifestly doesn't do what the marketing promises. > > I'd also encourage state attorney's general to take action, as the > researchers found that half of the blocked sites didn't exist, or > were improperly blocked. When a manufacturer ships 100,000 units, > but they are half filled with rocks, isn't that fraud? > > And a fine example of using cryptography to hide the fraud. Good thing > that extra criminal penalty didn't pass last year.... > > Also, couldn't we put together a class action by the folks that were > improperly blocked or classified. Anti-competitive, damage to > reputation, etc. Could be some nice punative damages. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.5.1 > > iQCVAwUBONFu3Nm/qMj6R+sxAQGokwP9FsROKCe2bgmxWnSK5Gm4YLNddoRcKGoZ > yid0z0Ww0D9eRutnCP+oJWD4BDFiQMbywP+r0Gz6QMZ+ZMeqt2BrLuVIDeJ8FU5U > ZaUw2+vI7xv8J5s9BI8jQ8Fww+FLzT5VVi5dzQr2wzhLQLAukF4EU3xG3HMNYgTP > m22qRVWC3rg= > =cMT6 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | [EMAIL PROTECTED] U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm -->It's warm here.<--
Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptanalysts who revealed flaws in itssoftware
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:12:10 -0800
- CyberPatrol sues cryptanalysts wh... Declan McCullagh
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptan... Ed Gerck
- CyberPatrol sues cryptan... Lenny Foner
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cry... William Allen Simpson
- Re: CyberPatrol sues... John Doe Number Two
- Re: CyberPatrol sues... William Allen Simpson
- Re: CyberPatrol ... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: CyberPa... Ed Gerck
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cry... Marshall Clow
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptan... Bilgates Remailer

