>From Totaltele.com
(It's one of those free-registration online trade rags; the amount
I quoted below looks like fair-use quantities, and you can read more
at the web site...)
India's doing a big telecom/ecommerce bill, and
various people have been throwing stuff into it. 
This part fortunately failed.
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

http://www.totaltele.com/secure/view.asp?ArticleID=27536&pub=tt&categoryid=626


The Indian government has dropped a proposed amendment to a
                  planned information technology bill that would have required
                  compulsory monitoring of cybercafe users by proprietors,
an official
                  said on Monday.

                  "It has been deleted. It is not here, the amendments
proposed," said an
                  official, who did not wish to be identified.

                  The bill, which aims to provide a legal framework for
electronic
                  commerce, was listed for debate and passage in the lower
house of
                  parliament on Monday.

                  It aims at faciliating digital signatures, electronic
transactions and use
                  of electronic documents as legal records.

                  The government's decision to drop the proposed amendments
came
                  after industry opposition to certain provisions of the
bill and criticism
                  from opposition parties in parliament.

                  Criticism mainly concerned amendments of the bill which
stipulated
                  compulsory registration of details on Web sites hosted
from India and
                  also a thorough recording of visitors to Internet cafes
and the sites
                  they visit by the cafe owners.

                  The clause was considered draconian because it prescribed
fines and
                  imprisonment in cases where the rules are breached, and
also set a
                  six-month deadline on providing Web site details.

                  Opposition deputies said the government was seeking to
rush the bill
                  through without giving them enough time to analyse the
proposed
                  landmark legislation.
...more...

Reply via email to