On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Neil Johnson wrote: >But the Bob has no control of his risk (genetics), or at least not yet :). >The insurance company does. Say What?! Sorry, no insurance company has the power to say who is and is not born with particular genetics. >I don't have a problem with insurance companies raising rates for people who >smoke, are overweight (cough, cough), or have high cholesterol (cough, >cough, cough). That's behavior that can be changed. You speak as though the insurance companies business where arbitration of morals rather than arbitration of risks. They can't make money arbitrating morals -- at least not without becoming religions. Bear
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? Neil Johnson
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: Re: why should it be trus... Tim May
- Re: Re: why should it be ... Yardena Arar + Christian Goetze
- Re: Re: why should i... Tim May
- Re: Re: Re: why ... Neil Johnson
- Re: Re: Re: why ... Tim May
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ... Neil Johnson
- Re: Re: why shou... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Re: why should it be ... Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be... Nathan Saper
- Re: why should i... Nathan Saper
- Re: Insurance (was: why should it... Neil Johnson
- Re: Insurance (was: why shoul... Tim May
- Re: Re: Insurance (was: w... Neil Johnson
- Re: Re: Insurance (was: why s... Neil Johnson
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: Re: why should it be trusted? Ray Dillinger
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper