On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
>You're thinking too literally. Show of force: When an employer reminds
>a slacker that having a job is not a right.
That's just shit rolling downhill. How long is a manager going to have
his job if he *doesn't* fire slackers? Or how long can an employer
continue to make a profit and thus remain in business if they never
clear "dead-weight" employees out of the company?
Reminding a slacker of this fact is merely a reality check.
Now, if it were an attractive member of the appropriate sex who was
refusing to have sex with the employer, *that* would be a pure show of
force...
Bear
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Anonymous
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft sparky
- Re: CDR: Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Harmon Seaver
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Greg Broiles
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Jim Burnes
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Jim Burnes
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... James A. Donald
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Ray Dillinger
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... James A. Donald
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... petro
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Tim May
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Mac Norton
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... Declan McCullagh
- Re: oppose nomination of John A... John Young
- Re: CDR: Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcr... Bill Stewart
- Re: oppose nomination of John Ashcroft Declan McCullagh

