On 08/30/2016 08:14 PM, juan wrote:

> You obviously don't belong

Awww Butthurt!

End of convo.

Rr

> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:44:56 -0700
> Razer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 08/30/2016 07:17 PM, juan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:00:33 -0700
>>> Razer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Your civil society without oversight is absolute bullshit. 
>>>
>>>
>>>     What do you mean by 'oversight'? Apart from yet again
>>> showing that you don't know fuck about liberalism. 
> 
> 
> 
>       I'm still waiting for you to explain what you meant
>       by 'oversight'. 
> 
>       Of course, I'd bet a couple of cents that 'oversight' means
>       'state' or 'government', but I'm giving you a chance for you to
>       embarrass yourself in a less crass way. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>     
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm proposing, as so many political writers in history have
>>>> purported, thet first there has to be change in the people. 
>>>
>>>     What THE FUCK are you talking about. And who are the so
>>> many 'political writers' you invoke. Go ahead, post the long
>>>     list.
>>
>>
>> Roszak
>> Marcuse
>> RD Laing
>> Paul Goodman
> 
>>
>> For a start. Don't like 'em? No one cares. TSOL and fuck off.
> 
>       
>       So what's that? Looks like a bunch a clowns from the New Left
>       and 'recycled' state socialist? LOL
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>
>> Sorry. Really not interested in writing a treatise on how to live
>> honorably.
>>
> 
> 
>       Translation : I can't even NAME the garbage political system I
>       consider 'honorable' - 'honorable' isn't that a feudal/petit
>       burgeois term or something??
> 
> 
>       Anyway, what are you interested in? You obviously don't belong
>       in a supposedly crypto anarchist mailing. You are hostile to
>       libertarian philosophy, and you are an apologist of the
>       pentagon's fake anonimity network. So rayzer, what's your game? 
> 

Reply via email to