> On Sep 8, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 01:00:15PM -0700, Sean Lynch wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM, John Newman <j...@synfin.org> wrote:
>>> How about we just call it "bullshit" ? Obviously MSM is total fucking
>>> garbage....
>>> While we're at it, whats up with the constant russia-insider.com links?
>>> This shit is pure propaganda, every bit as bad as any MSM....
> Do you recall this question being asked twice before?
> And do you recall my answer both times?
> (reminder hint - it's also in the subject of some of the threads;
> also notice threading, and the ability to filter both subject lines and
> threads)

I don’t see “[RUS]” in the subject of this thread.  And even if it
was, it doesn’t mean someone can’t ask what the fuck you are thinking.
Much of what you say makes sense, but the whole well is poisoned
by this constant Russian apologetic bullshit.

Why do you lick Putin's balls? Who REALLY thinks that Putin and
Russia have better intentions than the USA or any other nation in
the world?  

Reminds me of those poor “communist” dupes who spied for the USSR
throughout its history, but they didn’t want money, they did it all
for Papa Joe, and a “true workers state!” Except, we are talking
Papa Vlad, and a “true mafia state.”

I’m done pointing out your apologies for and obsession with
Russia and its dictator.  (who was never convicted of a bribe, and
might not have had anything to do with Litvinenko, and makes good
speeches!... =).


>>> http://kremlintrolls.com/t/20150620-ri_footprint.html
>>> http://www.stopfake.org/en/is-russia-insider-sponsored-by-a-
>>> russian-oligarch-with-the-ties-to-the-european-far-right/
>>> http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/04/bausman-and-fraud-at-russia-insider.html
>>> http://www.fort-russ.com/2015/11/reading-between-lines-great-war-of.html
>>> https://nobsrussia.com/tag/russia-insider/
>>> "Long time readers and Russia watchers know that one of the most odious
>>> pro-Kremlin
>>> sites in existence is Russia Insider. Rather than create original
>>> content, most of
>>> their articles consist of material reprinted from other sources,
>>> typically Kremlin
>>> media outlets but also including sites featuring ideological racism and
>>> Holocaust
>>> denial. What better sources for a site that still uses the “Kiev Nazi
>>> junta” trope?"
>> Interesting that RI is associated with holocaust deniers, as I just
>> realized yesterday that Zen is himself a holocaust denier when he posted a
>> bunch of holocaust denial links.
> Is holding that there is poor evidence for 6 million, and reasonable
> evidence for ~2.X million, and that the USA concentration camps were no
> better in some cases worse, the gulag another equally "fun" place to be,
> and the propaganda around "the Jewish Holocaust" which began well before
> WW2, and that "it's humans dude, we gotta fix us, all of us", is somehow
> a "bad" thing?
> And is all that, and plenty more, and nuance and subtlety, all bundled
> into "holocaust denier" a suitable way to engage in constructive
> conversation?
> "Conspiracy theorists" ... that's "original" :/

Reply via email to