On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:45:31 +0300 Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0300, juan wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:49:39 +0300 > > Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote: > > > > https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/09/someone_is_lear.html > > > > > > lol, Russia and China. Did he miss the Norks? > > > > > > Come on guys. Schneier is one of 'us' - he's a 'cypherpunk' > > at > > "guys" is not very politically correct for the gal chix on the list. I thought "guys" was gender neutral. Then again, despite being a fed, english is not my first language, so I wasn't 100% sure. http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/11816/is-guy-gender-neutral "You guys" is a familiar, all-inclusive way of addressing a group of men or women directly." "The plural "guys" definitely is, at least here in San Francisco — I'm often hearing all-girl companies here being greeted with 'Hi guys, how are you doing?'. etc. So, I won't be executed, at least for that offense.