From: aestetix <aeste...@aestetix.com>
>I'll preface by saying I hate both candidates, and support neither. However, 
>if>there is something in the public interest, they should publish it, 
>regardless of
>timing. I'm reminded of the NSA wiretap story that was delayed due to the 2004
>election, and would possibly have influenced the outcome.

One thing I don't understand is why 'they' haven't talked more about the NSA 
storage facility in Utah, the one outed by Snowden, that was said to be set up 
to record "all" (or as many as they could get) emails. (They were shut down by 
Federal court order awhile back, but I don't recall anybody saying they were 
ordered to delete already-acquired emails.)   
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center    Why wouldn't that have 
included those of Hillary Clinton, her correspondents, the Clinton Global 
Initiative, etc?  Maybe 'they' don't want to admit officially that this thing 
ever occurred, but hey, guys, "the word is out!".  And now, if anything, for 
them to fail to use that data set to re-create Hillary's deleted emails smacks 
of collusion.  While this specific facility was said to only have been opened 
in 2013, presumably it isn't the first such data storage bank, so Hillary's 
missing emails should be findable somewhere.
             Jim Bell
   

Reply via email to