On 10/03/2016 02:00 PM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> Not 'we'. I'm commenting on the estalishment progaganda you >> post. > > Yah. > >> >> What? You can't come up with any decent answer, piece-of-shit >> psychobabble scam artist? > > Actually, I found that answer quite entertaining. And seeing that our > previous interaction has proven to me that you will persist in > intentionally misrepresenting anything I write, and ignoring those parts > which you can't misrepresent, I have already decided that my future > interactions with you will be for entertainment purposes only. > > So how about that margarita there, Juanita?
Hey, everyone sane gets there eventually :) >> xorcist's bottom line : society is great after all and don't >> rock the boat or the terrists will get you! > > > Yup. That is clearly what I said. And any other the people on this list > who shares your reading difficulties will obviously also get that out of > it, so there is no point in me repeating a correction that will be > willfully misinterpreted by a two-bit shit-for-brains troll like yourself. :) > But I'll be glad to flirt any time, tiger. > >> >> So, from what manual does that come from? > > Like I told ya. A dingy hotel bar napkin. I'd scan it and prove it to ya, > since I know you like evidence and logic, but unfortunately I used it for > cleanup and tossed it with the condom wrapper, and your mom's phone number > already. True story. Mean :(
